Skip to content
Estate MVP
ProductHow it worksSeller LeadsPricingSign inStart free
ProductHow it worksSeller LeadsPricingProduct tourSign in

Estate MVP · Legal

AI transparency

Last updated
6 September 2026
Status
Current
Contact
legal@estatemvp.com

Contents

  1. What AI is used for
  2. What AI is never used for
  3. Why the boundary is drawn there
  4. What happens when the AI provider is unavailable
  5. Evidence, privacy and spending

The system calculates. AI explains. Every number that affects money is produced by a deterministic engine whose formula is versioned and stored with the result. A language model never selects one.

What AI is used for

Optional explanations describe an analysis the engine already computed. In saved research, choose “Explain saved analysis” to request one using the retained evidence. This action does not refresh listing data or buy more property-provider records. Text intake and criteria parsing use application rules; they are not currently a general-purpose AI assistant.

AI starts off and requires explicit provider, model and budget configuration. Adding a key alone does not enable calls. New explanations require a funded plan and available AI budget; unpaid trials do not include a separate AI subsidy. Matching and underwriting still work when AI is off.

What AI is never used for

Authoritative values are calculated or supplied separately from model prose
ValueHow it is actually produced
After-repair valueRetained comparable evidence and a labeled calculation method, or a separately labeled operator assumption
Rent estimateProvider data and HUD fair market rents
Repair budgetOperator-supplied, or modelled and labelled as an estimate
Maximum allowable offerA versioned underwriting formula
Offer priceThe minimum of the buy-box ceiling, the MAO and the absolute cap
Potential interested buyersA model using available market and demand evidence; it does not verify purchasing intent
Match scoreDeterministic scoring against stated criteria
Whether to contact somebodyConsent records and the data source's own license terms

Why the boundary is drawn there

A language model is good at reading messy text and bad at being accountable for a figure. Six months after an offer, the question is not "what would the model say now" but "why was this exactly $181,400" — and that answer has to be read from a record, not regenerated. Every proposal stores the engine versions, the full price derivation and the confidence, so the answer is retrieved rather than recomputed.

What happens when the AI provider is unavailable

Analysis continues. Explanations become plainer, but every matching, underwriting and automation decision is unaffected, because none of them depended on the model in the first place.

Evidence, privacy and spending

An explanation request sends a fact sheet, including the property address, modeled results and known gaps, to the configured model provider. Estate MVP does not train a model from this material. The provider handles the request under its own account settings and terms, which the operator must review before enabling it.

The server checks the reply’s structure and grounded claims before displaying the approved fields. These checks reduce unsupported output; they do not make AI prose infallible. Inspect the underlying saved evidence before acting on an explanation.

Identical validated explanations are cached within the workspace. Each new attempt reserves a conservative allocation against organization and deployment budgets. Input, output and duration are bounded. Failed or uncertain calls are not automatically retried, and their allocations are retained because a request may still have incurred cost. Allocation reports are separate from property records and are not provider invoices.

Questions about this page?

General questions: support@estatemvp.com. Privacy requests: legal@estatemvp.com. Security reports: security@estatemvp.com.

Estate MVP
TermsPrivacyRefundsSecurityAccessibilityAI transparencyAccount noticeContact
AI transparency · Estate MVP